Is “America” a Religion?

This post was inspired by a Brew Theology conversation held at Aardwolf Brewing Co a week ago. While I share my personal views in this post, there is a Brew Theology discussion guide which presents this information a little more objectively. If you’d like resources to talk about civil religion, hit up our facebook page and give the guide a look!

In its broadest sense, “religion” is the values, rituals, symbols, and stories which define our identities and connect us to something larger than ourselves. Normally, when we hear the word religion, we think of major world religions (Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and so on), but what if religion goes beyond these categories? Can you have a personal religion or a community religion? Can a favorite karaoke song or an annual neighborhood cookout take on religious significance? Can a country develop its own religion?

Regarding that last one, Thomas Jefferson believed so. A student of the Enlightenment era of philosophy who identified as more deist than Christian, Jefferson drew heavy influence from the philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who argued for an idea called “civil religion.” A tool to unite a country’s people on a spiritual level, civil religion has four core tenets:

(1) an undefined creator god (with inter-religious appeal)
(2) the promise of some sort of afterlife
(3) a concept of justice based on rewarding value and punishing vice
(4) tolerance of all major world religions

Rousseau believed that a country’s values, rituals, symbols, and myths would emerge naturally, but a leader who understood and cultivated civil religion could do even more to inspire a country. As such, Jefferson baked principles of civil religion directly into the Declaration of Independence, appealing to a vague creator god and establishing life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as foundational American principles. Other early American leaders bought into the concept as well. Ben Franklin and James Madison saw civil religion as an important asset, and Thomas Paine, the most radical of the bunch, even believed civil religion would eventually replace world religions. Throughout America’s history, other leaders have drawn on this idea (whether intentionally or not). Some examples include appeals to “manifest destiny” to promote American expansion, the insertion of “under God” into the pledge of allegiance, and virtually every utterance of the phrase “God bless America” ever. In fact, once you know about civil religion, it’s hard not to see it all over American culture:

We have our values: independence, individualism, integrity, bravery, liberty, the American Dream

We have our rituals: presidential inaugurations, Memorial Day commemorations, Fourth of July fireworks

We have our symbols: the eagle, the flag, our armed forces, our national landmarks

We have our myths: George Washington’s cherry tree, Abe Lincoln’s honesty, William Prescott’s famous “Don’t fire ’til you see the whites of their eyes!“— whether these stories literally happened is less important than the virtues they convey.

If the items on this list resonate with you, then they’re doing exactly what the components of a religion are supposed to do: foster a sense of belonging among participants and connect us to something bigger than ourselves (in this case, America). But now that we’ve identified some elements of American civil religion, we have to ask the unsettling question: Can Christianity and civil religion coexist? Christian leaders have been divided on the issue for centuries. Puritan colonists spoke of America as a new Promised Land, and American Evangelicals (the Falwells and Grahams for example) have utilized civil religion as a rallying cry for decades. On the other hand, leaders like Martin Luther King, Jr. regarded civil religion as a form of idolatry, and the modern Progressive Christian movement seems largely opposed to it.

Personally, I choose to keep civil religion at arm’s length. After all, when mixed with major world religions, civil religion has a way of watering them down. Besides, when you really break down the key tenets civil religion, they don’t mesh all that well with Christianity:

The distant, passive creator god of civil religion
sounds little like the fiercely relational God of Christianity.

The vague, remembrance-based afterlife of civil religion
looks nothing like the eternal Kingdom described in Christianity.

The consequence-based justice system of civil religion
in no way resembles the boundless mercy of Jesus.

Even the religious tolerance espoused in civil religion is more about blurring religions together and smoothing over differences,
while real religious dialogue celebrates what makes each religion unique.

Ultimately, I love America. Those values, symbols, rituals, and myths I listed earlier are all important to me; however, I find our civil religion pretty mediocre by comparison to Christ’s Kingdom. I’m still proud to be an American. I still celebrate the 4th of July. I still love cookouts. I even tolerate fireworks (even though they’re the bane of dog owners everywhere). I love my country, and I will always seek to make it a better place, but I hold it with an open hand because of my Christian faith. After all, there will come a time when America is no more —a time when countries and civilizations as we know them cease to be—, and in that time, it won’t really matter who was an American. The only citizenship that will matter is with Christ.

4 thoughts on “Is “America” a Religion?

  1. My only issue with this discussion from last week (and you mentioned it here again) is the civil “afterlife”. All the other elements I easily recognize in our society (and agree that they quickly may become idolatrous for many folks in and out of the church) but this one is difficult for me. Yes, people will talk about (and lampoon) Heaven and Hell with the idea of folks floating on clouds with harps or being tortured by little red goat-boys with tails and pitchforks after we die… but my honest secular experiences in life suggest to me that most folks dont really consider or worry about what happens after we die, until they get to that point.

    This is very concerning to me as a member and leader in the church, we have been failing to educate the Body (about many things) and instead have allowed the world and society do the teaching which has led to false or erroneous ideas and many churches shift away from orthodoxy.

    For all that America is, it is not ancient Israel, it is not Israel restored, and it most certainly is not Christ’s Kingdom…but it is the “authority” which we here do need to submit to, so long as it is just and not working contrary to God’s rule.

    That is why I pray He hastens the Day, Come Lord Jesus!

    Sorry for the soapbox this am…

    1. No worries, Joe! Soapboxes may be off limits at Brew Theology, but they are totally welcome here. I like the way you phrased America as an authority we submit to so long as it’s not working contrary to God’s rule, and I think a lot of the political discord among different branches of Christianity right now can be summarized well in that phrasing: in what ways is our country acting contrary to God’s rule, and how should we respond? That’s probably a way bigger topic than we want to address in a blog comments section though!

      Regarding the afterlife, I think there is an American notion of immortality of heroes (particularly veterans), and I’ve been struggling with whether that constitutes a proper belief in an afterlife. We have a small handful of holidays (Memorial Day, Veterans’ Day, July 4th) where remembering these fallen is a major component. Do you think it’s fair to call this an afterlife (however vague it might be)?

  2. From the bottom up:

    American Immortality, as you described that mindset is very much an old Greek idea such from the Homerian epics; where so long as the hero is remembered they do live on, many popular modern movies even make similar statements. We [Americans] tend to have an obsession with our “Legacy” and what people will remember about us. So I would agree with immortality, but still hesitant on afterlife…

    As Christians, our ideas concerning the “afterlife” versus Eternal Life in and with Christ, we can’t even agree and the Bible is very much unclear on the specifics beyond fellowship [koinenea] and being in the presence of God, no more tears and sorrow, a New Creation as it was meant to be…something we can only imagine as through a dim glass darkly.

    In regards to submission or resistance to “Godly” governmental authority, remember the American Revolution was called the “Presbyterian Revolt” by the British…and John Knox was a champion against the tyrannical British/Papist [Catholic] rule…devoting much study to determine if resistance was Biblical…[I am intentionally using older, inflammatory language for the historical context]. While I lean in those same directions, I do have to wonder if JK was pursuing his own form of proof-texting to justify his inclinations or if he did recognize previously overlooked truths in Scripture.

    Lastly, who are we to say what God desires and commands in the daily rule of government? When both sides of the political aisle try to claim Christ for themselves, yet it is my feeling that He wouldn’t side with any of them. [My political stance and affiliation has always been independent/NPA, though I lean towards the right on many subjects]. I’ve not seen Elijah, Isaiah, or Jeremiah moving around in DC lately who we know can say, “Thus Sayeth the LORD”…but Scripture does guide us, exegesis helps us to understand the message He needs us to convey and the Spirit gives us the words and the courage to proclaim it. Truly, a Christian resurgence and the right preaching of the Word from the pulpit is the best answer, guide, and hope for our country’s political situation…so the government for the people, by the people may be guided and led by God’s Word.

Leave a Reply